Resolving True Conflicts - Comparative Impairment

1) How would Bernhard be resolved under the 1^st Restatement? (Remember – there were some exceptions to the place of the wrong rule…)

2) Does the Bernhard court use Currie’s moderate and restrained interpretation or Baxter’s comparative impairment approach?

3) Does the comparative impairment approach involve the potential limitation of both states' laws or only of the law of the forum? Does Currie’s moderate and restrained interpretation approach involve the potential limitation of both states' laws or only of the law of the forum?

4) Are Currie’s and Baxter’s methods a means of identifying false conflicts or of resolving true conflicts?